Next article>>

Transitional Penalty Relief

The penalty relief described in this Chapter is designed to provide transitional relief for MNE groups in the initial years during which the GloBE Rules come into effect. It reflects a common understanding amongst implementing jurisdictions on the necessity to provide relief to taxpayers in those cases where an MNE has taken reasonable measures to ensure the correct application of the GloBE Rules.

A common understanding on penalty relief is intended to provide MNEs (and those responsible for managing its tax compliance obligations) with a “soft-landing” during the initial years in which the rules are being introduced. This soft landing will allow MNEs and tax administrations to familiarize themselves with the rules and develop the data collection and the reporting and compliance systems to comply with the new rules without the risk of being penalised for making reasonable mistakes.

1. During the Transition Period, no penalties or sanctions should apply in connection with the filing of a GloBE Information Return where a tax administration considers that an MNE has taken “reasonable measures” to ensure the correct application of the GloBE Rules. A tax administration may consider that an MNE has taken reasonable measures where the MNE can demonstrate that it has acted in good faith to understand and comply with the relevant domestic application of the GloBE Rules and the QDMTT.

2. Transition Period means any Fiscal Year beginning on or before 31/12/2026 but not including a Fiscal Year that ends after 30/6/2028.

The common understanding on penalties requires that implementing jurisdictions give careful consideration as to the appropriateness of applying penalties or sanctions where an MNE has taken reasonable measures to ensure the correct application of the GloBE Rules.

The term “reasonable measures” is not defined. Rather it should be understood in light of each jurisdiction’s existing rules and practice. An MNE can demonstrate it has taken reasonable measures if it can demonstrate it has, in good faith, put in place the appropriate systems to understand and comply with the rule. Whether a taxpayer has met the standard of taking reasonable measures must be assessed by a tax administration based on the facts and circumstances of the case. For example, a tax administration could waive the imposition of a penalty on the UPE or Filing Constituent Entity if such Entity fully disclosed the impugned GloBE computation to the tax administration. Other examples where tax administrations may waive penalties or sanctions during the Transition Period, include:

a) where there is a mistake of fact that is reasonable in the circumstances;

b) the errors can be reasonably attributed to unfamiliarity with the rules in the initial implementation years (e.g., isolated mathematical or transposition errors);

c) the requirements of the rule are unclear and the MNE’s actions are based on a reasonable interpretation of the rule; or

d) the MNE’s actions do not result in a reduction of top-up tax liability in the current or future year.

In many cases, jurisdictions already provide, as a matter of law or administrative practice, for penalty relief in accordance with the common understanding. Other jurisdictions may need to adapt these penalty relief requirements to fit within their constitutional and legal system. While the common understanding aims to provide relief for all penalties or sanctions in connection with a GloBE Information Return, the requirement that the MNE must take reasonable measures means that, in practice, the transitional penalty relief would not apply to cases of avoidance, fraud, or abuse. Finally, the transitional penalty relief would not impact the requirement to correct any errors and pay any unpaid/underpaid Topup Tax (including any interest) for previous Fiscal Years in accordance with requirements of domestic legislation.

Country Profile – Japan

|0 Comments

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi.

Model Rules – QDMTT and UTPR Safe Harbours

|0 Comments

QDMTT and UTPR Safe Harbours QDMTT Safe Harbour 1. A Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (QDMTT) is a domestic minimum tax imposed by a jurisdiction on those Constituent Entities of an MNE Group [...]

Introduction to the GloBE Rules – OECD Commentary

|0 Comments

Introduction to the GloBE Rules - OECD Commentary 1. The Global Base Erosion rules (GloBE Rules) have been developed as part of the solution for addressing the tax challenges of the digital economy. [...]

Model Rules – Globe Information Return

|0 Comments

<< Go back to overview Next article>> Globe Information Return (GIR) The GloBE Information Return (GIR) contains the information a tax administration needs to perform an appropriate risk assessment [...]

Model Rules – Transitional Penalty Relief

|0 Comments

<< Go back to overview Next article>> Transitional Penalty Relief The penalty relief described in this Chapter is designed to provide transitional relief for MNE groups in the initial [...]

Model Rules – Permanent Safe Harbour

|0 Comments

<< Go back to overview Next article>> Permanent Safe Harbour Where an MNE’s operations in a jurisdiction do not meet the requirements of a transitional safe harbour, they may [...]